🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," said the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, other states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.